Stop the AI Witch Hunt

Transcripts
1

We Have to Stop the AI Witch Hunts in the Writing Community

Writers. Authors. Readers. We need to talk.

We have to stop accusing people of using AI to write their books—especially when we truly don’t know. This trend of pointing fingers, running texts through AI detectors, and publicly calling people out is dangerous… and it’s getting out of hand.

When You Don’t Know, Don’t Assume

Let’s say you come across a book that feels off. Maybe:

  • The language seems clunky
  • It’s overly polished or precise
  • Something just… doesn’t sit right

So what do you do?

You copy and paste the text into an “AI checker,” wait for a percentage to flash on the screen, and from there, decide you know the truth. You’re convinced the author used artificial intelligence to cheat—so you leave a bad review, blast them on social media, or loudly call them out in public forums.

Friends, this is a slippery slope.

AI Detectors Are Not Scientific Proof

Here’s the thing:

  • AI detectors are not completely reliable
  • Many don’t disclose how accurate they are
  • Ironically, you’re using AI to accuse someone of using AI

Let’s be honest—these tools can be wrong. Just because a detector spits out a number does not mean it’s 100% proof that a human didn’t write the work.

And worse? They flag things like:

  • EM dashes
  • Semi-colons
  • Ellipses (yes, seriously—ellipses!)

If ellipses are a marker of AI authorship, I guess I’m a robot too.

There Are Lots of Reasons a Book Might Feel “Off”

Here are a few:

  • The writer is brand-new.
  • The book didn’t go through multiple rounds of beta readers.
  • There was no budget for professional editing.
  • The prose is experimental or stylistic.
  • It’s just not your type of writing.

None of that means the book was written by AI.

A book that’s heavy on big words? Long, lyrical sentences? Complex structure? Still not proof. That might just be the author’s natural voice—even if it’s different from yours.

False Accusations Can Ruin a Writer’s Career

Let me be clear:

  • I’m not defending the unethical use of AI in authorship.
  • But I am defending writers against false, unproven accusations.

Accusing someone of using AI when you don’t know the full story? That’s serious. That can:

  • Damage a reputation
  • Sink Goodreads ratings
  • Affect real-life sales
  • Shake a writer’s confidence
  • Ruin a creative career

Even for writers who haven’t used AI, the fear is real. It’s terrifying to think that one odd-sounding paragraph or stylistic quirk could trigger an unfair accusation and backlash.

Tread Carefully Before You Accuse

Please, before you post that review, share that screenshot, hit “publish” on your call-out—stop.

Think about what you’re doing.
Think about what you’re saying.
Think about the long-term impact on that person’s life—and livelihood.

No one is saying AI doesn’t pose a threat. I’m genuinely concerned about its misuse and how it could change the writing world. But you know what worries me more?

The way we’re starting to turn on each other.

The way suspicion, division, and finger-pointing are starting to break down trust in our community of writers and readers.

Final Thoughts

Yes, unethical use of AI is concerning. Yes, it impacts our future as creators. But so do unjustified accusations, cancel culture, and online witch hunts carried out without all the facts.

Let’s be vigilant—but also compassionate.
Curious—but cautious.
Informed—but kind.

The future of publishing is changing fast. The best thing we can do is try to navigate it with integrity—and protect each other wherever possible.

That’s all for now. Thanks for hearing me out—and please stay thoughtful out there.

Reference